<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Read Much?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writeabetternovel.net/read-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/read-much/</link>
	<description>Practical wisdom for novelists and other storytellers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 03:32:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Kurtz Skelding</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/read-much/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Kurtz Skelding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=89#comment-96</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;In my reading, I mix more contemporary fiction with the classics all the time. For me, it helps me keep relatively current as well as filling in what I consider to be gaps in my own &quot;literary education.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When reading, or more accurately, thinking offline about the story that I am reading, I mentally pull apart the construct of the story itself. It gives me little epiphanies when I discover something the writer did in a rather subtle manner. For instance: &quot;oh, I get it! The lawyer had to die because he could possibly have shed light on the whole mystery! His death kept the cast in the dark longer. How clever!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my reading, I mix more contemporary fiction with the classics all the time. For me, it helps me keep relatively current as well as filling in what I consider to be gaps in my own &#8220;literary education.&#8221; </p>
<p>When reading, or more accurately, thinking offline about the story that I am reading, I mentally pull apart the construct of the story itself. It gives me little epiphanies when I discover something the writer did in a rather subtle manner. For instance: &#8220;oh, I get it! The lawyer had to die because he could possibly have shed light on the whole mystery! His death kept the cast in the dark longer. How clever!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Edel</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/read-much/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Edel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=89#comment-97</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think I would be able to write now if I hadn&#039;t spent half my childhood with my nose in a book.  I&#039;m actually on an interesting quest right now, trying to become better read.  I have a second-hand textbook with stories from the classic authors I never had time to read as an English major, and I go to the university library at night to read from literary magazines.  I started this as &quot;research&quot; - I wanted to figure out what makes for a good short story and learn which magazines are publishing the kinds of stories I write.  It&#039;s strange, alternating Hawthorne and Faulkner with more modern fiction - I&#039;m not sure yet what I&#039;m learning.  But reading fiction and writing fiction increases my appreciation for both.  Many of the kinds of stories that I couldn&#039;t stand reading for class I understand now only because I can see what goes into the writing, and I can plunge deeper in my own writing after seeing where other writers are going.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, I&#039;m not quite sure how to separate my current writing ambitions from genuine appreciation of good writing.  Honestly, I have to say that the one thing most helped me appreciate reading was taking workshops in college.  Reading and critiquing the stories of my friends taught me how to read critically, but to this day it sets me on edge when I read published stories that don&#039;t work for me.  Kind of a mixed blessing - it takes some of the fun out of reading when you catch yourself analyzing style and syntax in a paperback you picked up for &quot;fun.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I would be able to write now if I hadn&#8217;t spent half my childhood with my nose in a book.  I&#8217;m actually on an interesting quest right now, trying to become better read.  I have a second-hand textbook with stories from the classic authors I never had time to read as an English major, and I go to the university library at night to read from literary magazines.  I started this as &#8220;research&#8221; &#8211; I wanted to figure out what makes for a good short story and learn which magazines are publishing the kinds of stories I write.  It&#8217;s strange, alternating Hawthorne and Faulkner with more modern fiction &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure yet what I&#8217;m learning.  But reading fiction and writing fiction increases my appreciation for both.  Many of the kinds of stories that I couldn&#8217;t stand reading for class I understand now only because I can see what goes into the writing, and I can plunge deeper in my own writing after seeing where other writers are going.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I&#8217;m not quite sure how to separate my current writing ambitions from genuine appreciation of good writing.  Honestly, I have to say that the one thing most helped me appreciate reading was taking workshops in college.  Reading and critiquing the stories of my friends taught me how to read critically, but to this day it sets me on edge when I read published stories that don&#8217;t work for me.  Kind of a mixed blessing &#8211; it takes some of the fun out of reading when you catch yourself analyzing style and syntax in a paperback you picked up for &#8220;fun.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Kurtz Skelding</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/read-much/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Kurtz Skelding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=89#comment-98</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I love this topic. One of my favorite things to do is listen to what a person is into and suggest a book to read. I even have a top 10 favorite books of all time. I love, love, love to read. I re-read things fairly often. I listen to books on CD in the car on a fairly short commute (15-20 minutes) and then pop out the CD and listen to it when I am cooking dinner. I am currently re-listening to Bram Stoker&#039;s Dracula, which is so great on CD. You can hear the horror in the reader&#039;s voice. I also have a stack of books by my bed and a whole stack waiting to be read in the living room. Not to sound ass-kissy (can I say that??) but I just started Stark Raving Elvis last night. Got through 2 chapters in only a few minutes. Very entertaining and readable. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, I agree with Ann - I read books differently now as a writer. Take Dracula for instance. I loved it the first time because of the great story, but the second time I can truly appreciate how difficult a task the author had. It is a book written in correspondence - letters, diary entries, newspaper articles, etc. So, the author tells the story in first person from 6 or 8 voices/characters. Men, women, different ages. It is really a remarkable book, from both a reader&#039;s and a writer&#039;s perspective. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do believe that a writer needs to be a reader. It is important to know what is out there, just as a doctor or lawyer keeps up with trade journals. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do not remember being this charged up about reading when I was in HS or college. I often wonder what could be done to keep people engaged, even what I could do. If the Kindle gets new people to read, I&#039;m all for it. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One last thing - read anything by Jasper Fforde. And, read The Stolen Child by Keith Donahue. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t help myself!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this topic. One of my favorite things to do is listen to what a person is into and suggest a book to read. I even have a top 10 favorite books of all time. I love, love, love to read. I re-read things fairly often. I listen to books on CD in the car on a fairly short commute (15-20 minutes) and then pop out the CD and listen to it when I am cooking dinner. I am currently re-listening to Bram Stoker&#8217;s Dracula, which is so great on CD. You can hear the horror in the reader&#8217;s voice. I also have a stack of books by my bed and a whole stack waiting to be read in the living room. Not to sound ass-kissy (can I say that??) but I just started Stark Raving Elvis last night. Got through 2 chapters in only a few minutes. Very entertaining and readable. </p>
<p>Anyway, I agree with Ann &#8211; I read books differently now as a writer. Take Dracula for instance. I loved it the first time because of the great story, but the second time I can truly appreciate how difficult a task the author had. It is a book written in correspondence &#8211; letters, diary entries, newspaper articles, etc. So, the author tells the story in first person from 6 or 8 voices/characters. Men, women, different ages. It is really a remarkable book, from both a reader&#8217;s and a writer&#8217;s perspective. </p>
<p>I do believe that a writer needs to be a reader. It is important to know what is out there, just as a doctor or lawyer keeps up with trade journals. </p>
<p>I do not remember being this charged up about reading when I was in HS or college. I often wonder what could be done to keep people engaged, even what I could do. If the Kindle gets new people to read, I&#8217;m all for it. </p>
<p>One last thing &#8211; read anything by Jasper Fforde. And, read The Stolen Child by Keith Donahue. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help myself!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Willkomm</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/read-much/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Willkomm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=89#comment-99</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It is interesting that Bill raised this subject.  At last weeks (Nov. 16-18) North Carolina Writers Conference, Amy Kurtz and Ryan Edel and I were discussing this very subject.  We are often taken aback when a writer says boldly, &quot;Oh, I don&#039;t read.&quot;  We wonder just how a writer can not also be a reader.  How does one learn the skill or art of nuance?  How does one learn to describe their surroundings or human emotion, unless they read?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We decided it is impossible, especially after reading what the said &quot;non-reader&quot; wrote.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have to admit, since I started reading, I read differently.  I see poor writing, feel it, and it hurts.  I also feel and appreciate the skilled and beautiful way an author can turn a phrase. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As a writer, I find I thirst more for writing.  I read at night and I listen to books while driving around in the car ( I&#039;m currently listening to Widow of the South by Robert Hicks and I&#039;m reading Lost in A Good Book by Jasper Fford -- Amy is cheering!)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, I think I am coming around to agree with the YA author, Louise Hawes, who stated that she can not read the same type of work she is currently working on, she feels it gets too muddled.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And as a writer and reader who currently has a home library of more than 3,000 books...I am an eternal optimist that reading in whatever form (downloaded to a palm pilot, iPod, Kindle, CD, or old-fashioned bound hardcover) reading will endure.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that Bill raised this subject.  At last weeks (Nov. 16-18) North Carolina Writers Conference, Amy Kurtz and Ryan Edel and I were discussing this very subject.  We are often taken aback when a writer says boldly, &#8220;Oh, I don&#8217;t read.&#8221;  We wonder just how a writer can not also be a reader.  How does one learn the skill or art of nuance?  How does one learn to describe their surroundings or human emotion, unless they read?</p>
<p>We decided it is impossible, especially after reading what the said &#8220;non-reader&#8221; wrote.</p>
<p>I have to admit, since I started reading, I read differently.  I see poor writing, feel it, and it hurts.  I also feel and appreciate the skilled and beautiful way an author can turn a phrase. </p>
<p>As a writer, I find I thirst more for writing.  I read at night and I listen to books while driving around in the car ( I&#8217;m currently listening to Widow of the South by Robert Hicks and I&#8217;m reading Lost in A Good Book by Jasper Fford &#8212; Amy is cheering!)</p>
<p>However, I think I am coming around to agree with the YA author, Louise Hawes, who stated that she can not read the same type of work she is currently working on, she feels it gets too muddled.</p>
<p>And as a writer and reader who currently has a home library of more than 3,000 books&#8230;I am an eternal optimist that reading in whatever form (downloaded to a palm pilot, iPod, Kindle, CD, or old-fashioned bound hardcover) reading will endure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

