<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Fiction Dying?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writeabetternovel.net/is-fiction-dying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/is-fiction-dying/</link>
	<description>Practical wisdom for novelists and other storytellers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 03:32:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Strummer</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/is-fiction-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Strummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=114#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Fiction isn&#039;t dying. The intelligent reader is dying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fiction isn&#8217;t dying. The intelligent reader is dying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen King scares us again &#124; Write a Better Novel</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/is-fiction-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen King scares us again &#124; Write a Better Novel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=114#comment-305</guid>
		<description>[...] from your response to the loaded question I posted last time, it&#8217;s safe for fiction writers to go back in the water. In case of trouble, however, I&#8217;m [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from your response to the loaded question I posted last time, it&#8217;s safe for fiction writers to go back in the water. In case of trouble, however, I&#8217;m [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsey Rushmore</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/is-fiction-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey Rushmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=114#comment-156</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A couple thoughts here...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1. Fiction is alive and well. All you have to do is walk into the library or a Borders and see the bussle. Fiction&#039;s medium of delivery, however, has altered with the times, but this isn&#039;t a bad thing. Audiobooks keep me sane during rush hour and have a few of my friends who never liked &quot;reading&quot; engrossed as they listen to the narrator dish the story.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2. Fiction&#039;s getting sized up by non-fiction. The &quot;For Dummies,&quot; &quot;KISS&quot; and &quot;Idiot&#039;s Guide&quot; series are on fire. Customers flock to books on entrepreneurship, web design, home decorating, dieting, golfing, antique collecting, and you name it. These books have more pictures and fact boxes than every before, and scream user-friendliness, attracting people who may never have cracked open a novel. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;3. Fiction is not dead, but often dormant. As for those people who&#039;ve never cracked open a novel, I&#039;m afraid that list may be growing for our youth. Just the other week, a cousin of mine who&#039;s an art teacher did a unit on fairy tale art. To launch the unit, she gathered her group of 9th grade nightmares for a reading of &quot;Rumpelstiltzken.&quot; To her surprise, most of the kids had never heard of common fairy tales like this. The happy ending: Those rowdy kids had her undivided attention for the whole reading, soaking up the literature like dry sponges and begging her to read them another story tomorrow. Remember these are 9th graders, not 4th graders.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So the fiction lover&#039;s seed of interest is present in everybody-- something (like an audiobook) or someone (like a teacher) has just gotta tap it.  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple thoughts here&#8230;</p>
<p>1. Fiction is alive and well. All you have to do is walk into the library or a Borders and see the bussle. Fiction&#8217;s medium of delivery, however, has altered with the times, but this isn&#8217;t a bad thing. Audiobooks keep me sane during rush hour and have a few of my friends who never liked &#8220;reading&#8221; engrossed as they listen to the narrator dish the story.</p>
<p>2. Fiction&#8217;s getting sized up by non-fiction. The &#8220;For Dummies,&#8221; &#8220;KISS&#8221; and &#8220;Idiot&#8217;s Guide&#8221; series are on fire. Customers flock to books on entrepreneurship, web design, home decorating, dieting, golfing, antique collecting, and you name it. These books have more pictures and fact boxes than every before, and scream user-friendliness, attracting people who may never have cracked open a novel. </p>
<p>3. Fiction is not dead, but often dormant. As for those people who&#8217;ve never cracked open a novel, I&#8217;m afraid that list may be growing for our youth. Just the other week, a cousin of mine who&#8217;s an art teacher did a unit on fairy tale art. To launch the unit, she gathered her group of 9th grade nightmares for a reading of &#8220;Rumpelstiltzken.&#8221; To her surprise, most of the kids had never heard of common fairy tales like this. The happy ending: Those rowdy kids had her undivided attention for the whole reading, soaking up the literature like dry sponges and begging her to read them another story tomorrow. Remember these are 9th graders, not 4th graders.</p>
<p>So the fiction lover&#8217;s seed of interest is present in everybody&#8211; something (like an audiobook) or someone (like a teacher) has just gotta tap it.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peggy Payne</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/is-fiction-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggy Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=114#comment-157</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Audiobooks are still books, still novels, though I&#039;d rather read than listen, so that I can enjoy my daydreaming woven in.    &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But I do wish audiobooks weren&#039;t (mostly) abridged.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m still irked that the Count of Monte Cristo and Lorna Doone I was assigned as homework in seventh grade were trimmed-down versions.  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Audiobooks are still books, still novels, though I&#8217;d rather read than listen, so that I can enjoy my daydreaming woven in.    </p>
<p>But I do wish audiobooks weren&#8217;t (mostly) abridged.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still irked that the Count of Monte Cristo and Lorna Doone I was assigned as homework in seventh grade were trimmed-down versions.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Peacock</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/is-fiction-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Peacock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=114#comment-158</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Fiction will be dead when dreams are dead, when stories no longer move us, when there are no writers left in Chapel Hill, NC - and when will that be?  Never.  Or maybe I&#039;m just stubborn.  It&#039;s too bad, however, that most people come home from work too tired to read.  Perhaps writers should band together and protest the 40 hour work week.  Or is it 60 now? I guess what I am saying is that it&#039;s not fiction that is the problem, or even television and movies.  It&#039;s that as a society we work too many hours, and too many people have started to think that they are their jobs.  Uh oh - I feel a rant coming on.  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fiction will be dead when dreams are dead, when stories no longer move us, when there are no writers left in Chapel Hill, NC &#8211; and when will that be?  Never.  Or maybe I&#8217;m just stubborn.  It&#8217;s too bad, however, that most people come home from work too tired to read.  Perhaps writers should band together and protest the 40 hour work week.  Or is it 60 now? I guess what I am saying is that it&#8217;s not fiction that is the problem, or even television and movies.  It&#8217;s that as a society we work too many hours, and too many people have started to think that they are their jobs.  Uh oh &#8211; I feel a rant coming on.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall Kenan</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/is-fiction-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall Kenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=114#comment-159</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This anxiety has been around a long time: “recent” fiction has always been on the way out.  Folk in the 19th century were conflicted about what literature is/was.  Upstanding gentlemen had a tiny canon to choose from – and that did not include Dickens or Trollope or Austen or Eliot.  Contemporary writing was for WOMEN and children and common folk who could read: remember, literacy rates were so tiny that we aren’t talking about a lot of folk.  Austen’s combined readership during her lifetime was but a fraction of Karen Joy Fowler’s today.  The bookseller is right: More people read now than ever before.  Or at least more are buying books.  Sure, Dana Gioia’s National Endowment report is chilling (“Reading at Risk” 2004), but when you compare it to the historical facts, good new fiction is not in danger.  Really.  Not by a long shot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I just got off a plane, flying cross country.  These new big boys have videos on the back of each uncomfortable chair.  You can watch HGTV, ESPN 1-50, TNT, HBO, or play games, or pay $3.95 for a movie that was in theaters in June.  However, when I went to the bathroom, I saw on each lap (that didn’t hold a laptop): a book.  I saw: Water for Elephants, Harry Potter, Pride and Prejudice, and several obvious fantasy titles I’d never heard of, but the jackets were sexy.  So were some of the readers.  What does this mean?  Not much.  But I do believe that writing still competes powerfully with the seductive moving images that talk.  Words do something else.  Picture makers should have the anxiety (and they do, believe me).  What will they do when the power goes off?  Proust still works by candlelight.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh, and by the way, television is, at this moment, undergoing a historic aesthetic renaissance.  By this passage this observation is fact.  The Sopranos, The Shield, Six Feet Under, The Riches (why so many “The”s?)  I like Dexter a lot.  This week’s New Yorker magazine (10/22/07) has a wonderful piece about The Wire (another damned THE).  Shelby Foote and Walker Percy use to be obsessed with The Guiding Light, a soap opera.  The great Garcia Marquez has written for telenovelas. It’s good stuff.  It’s a powerful form.  But forms of artistic expression don’t necessarily have to battle for eye-time.  They can make love.  We can all get along.  In the words of that great American philosopher, Martha Stewart: It’s a good thing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Consider: 1941: In movie theaters, Citizen Kane.  It bombed.  Dumbo did better.  So did The Maltese Falcon.  In bookstores: Mildred Pierce; The Screwtape Letters; Vladimir Nabokov’s first novel written in English; Eudora Welty’s Curtain of Green.  Ann Tyler was born that year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Relax. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This anxiety has been around a long time: “recent” fiction has always been on the way out.  Folk in the 19th century were conflicted about what literature is/was.  Upstanding gentlemen had a tiny canon to choose from – and that did not include Dickens or Trollope or Austen or Eliot.  Contemporary writing was for WOMEN and children and common folk who could read: remember, literacy rates were so tiny that we aren’t talking about a lot of folk.  Austen’s combined readership during her lifetime was but a fraction of Karen Joy Fowler’s today.  The bookseller is right: More people read now than ever before.  Or at least more are buying books.  Sure, Dana Gioia’s National Endowment report is chilling (“Reading at Risk” 2004), but when you compare it to the historical facts, good new fiction is not in danger.  Really.  Not by a long shot.</p>
<p>I just got off a plane, flying cross country.  These new big boys have videos on the back of each uncomfortable chair.  You can watch HGTV, ESPN 1-50, TNT, HBO, or play games, or pay $3.95 for a movie that was in theaters in June.  However, when I went to the bathroom, I saw on each lap (that didn’t hold a laptop): a book.  I saw: Water for Elephants, Harry Potter, Pride and Prejudice, and several obvious fantasy titles I’d never heard of, but the jackets were sexy.  So were some of the readers.  What does this mean?  Not much.  But I do believe that writing still competes powerfully with the seductive moving images that talk.  Words do something else.  Picture makers should have the anxiety (and they do, believe me).  What will they do when the power goes off?  Proust still works by candlelight.</p>
<p>Oh, and by the way, television is, at this moment, undergoing a historic aesthetic renaissance.  By this passage this observation is fact.  The Sopranos, The Shield, Six Feet Under, The Riches (why so many “The”s?)  I like Dexter a lot.  This week’s New Yorker magazine (10/22/07) has a wonderful piece about The Wire (another damned THE).  Shelby Foote and Walker Percy use to be obsessed with The Guiding Light, a soap opera.  The great Garcia Marquez has written for telenovelas. It’s good stuff.  It’s a powerful form.  But forms of artistic expression don’t necessarily have to battle for eye-time.  They can make love.  We can all get along.  In the words of that great American philosopher, Martha Stewart: It’s a good thing.</p>
<p>Consider: 1941: In movie theaters, Citizen Kane.  It bombed.  Dumbo did better.  So did The Maltese Falcon.  In bookstores: Mildred Pierce; The Screwtape Letters; Vladimir Nabokov’s first novel written in English; Eudora Welty’s Curtain of Green.  Ann Tyler was born that year.</p>
<p>Relax. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilyn Wolf</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/is-fiction-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilyn Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=114#comment-160</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I sure as hell hope fiction is not dead because I am working like crazy on my 1st novel and am planning my 2nd one. And I&#039;m not getting any younger here! &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Seriously, I don&#039;t think fiction is dead.  We humans have been making up and passing along stories since we squatted around the fires in front of our caves. It&#039;s how we articulate and solve our dilemmas, how we gain insight into our fellow humans, how we see ourselves dancing our dance and come to understand that we&#039;re all the same in the midst of our great individuality. Fiction is the vehicle that carries a thousand variations of the same human drama - entertaining, teaching, and healing us all at the same time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It will never die. The form may change, but who cares?  That&#039;s just technology. We don&#039;t draw our stories on cave walls any more or write them out in longhand. We don&#039;t even use typewriters any longer. As long as the stories keep being created and told - that&#039;s what matters, and my money is on it still being done when the last human turns out the light.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure as hell hope fiction is not dead because I am working like crazy on my 1st novel and am planning my 2nd one. And I&#8217;m not getting any younger here! </p>
<p>Seriously, I don&#8217;t think fiction is dead.  We humans have been making up and passing along stories since we squatted around the fires in front of our caves. It&#8217;s how we articulate and solve our dilemmas, how we gain insight into our fellow humans, how we see ourselves dancing our dance and come to understand that we&#8217;re all the same in the midst of our great individuality. Fiction is the vehicle that carries a thousand variations of the same human drama &#8211; entertaining, teaching, and healing us all at the same time.</p>
<p>It will never die. The form may change, but who cares?  That&#8217;s just technology. We don&#8217;t draw our stories on cave walls any more or write them out in longhand. We don&#8217;t even use typewriters any longer. As long as the stories keep being created and told &#8211; that&#8217;s what matters, and my money is on it still being done when the last human turns out the light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Willkomm</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/is-fiction-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Willkomm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=114#comment-161</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;YES, AUDIO BOOKS COUNT!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think audio books have given us reading lovers another venue to read (or listen in this case).  We can read &quot;I Killed Hemingway&quot; -- which I&#039;m reading now, buy the evening and listen to &quot;Snowflower and the Secret Fan&quot; by day while in your car.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I doubt fiction will die because we all want and need the escape.  We need to live vicariously in someone elses shoes.  We strive to be as good as some protagonists and even as evil as others -- at least for a moment or two of our day.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What I can&#039;t see is the reading of books online as ever becoming popular.  It is too damn hard on the eyes and if I&#039;m going to print it out, then I might as well go buy the darn book at Borders. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One way to know just how popular fiction remains is iTunes.  Now you can download your new favorite book to listen to on your iPod.  If Apple says fiction is thriving, then shouldn&#039;t we believe as well?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Lastly, if what I witness this morning doesn&#039;t convince you &quot;naysayers&quot; out there, then nothing will.  It is book fair week at school (I have 3 children) and this morning was Donuts for Dads.  In 20 minutes we sold over $5,000 worth of books.  And, I might add, the Hannah Montana and High School Musical books were in the minority.  Authors such as Gary Paulson, Madeleine L&#039;Engle, Lois Lowry, Phyllis Naylor, &amp; Wilson Rawls were flying off the shelves along with a whole host of Newberry winners.  It was wonderful see!  A whole generation of readers coming up in the ranks, dissing the junky books in favor of good writing!!!!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On that note...I look forward to finishing I Killed Hemingway.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES, AUDIO BOOKS COUNT!</p>
<p>I think audio books have given us reading lovers another venue to read (or listen in this case).  We can read &#8220;I Killed Hemingway&#8221; &#8212; which I&#8217;m reading now, buy the evening and listen to &#8220;Snowflower and the Secret Fan&#8221; by day while in your car.</p>
<p>I doubt fiction will die because we all want and need the escape.  We need to live vicariously in someone elses shoes.  We strive to be as good as some protagonists and even as evil as others &#8212; at least for a moment or two of our day.</p>
<p>What I can&#8217;t see is the reading of books online as ever becoming popular.  It is too damn hard on the eyes and if I&#8217;m going to print it out, then I might as well go buy the darn book at Borders. </p>
<p>One way to know just how popular fiction remains is iTunes.  Now you can download your new favorite book to listen to on your iPod.  If Apple says fiction is thriving, then shouldn&#8217;t we believe as well?</p>
<p>Lastly, if what I witness this morning doesn&#8217;t convince you &#8220;naysayers&#8221; out there, then nothing will.  It is book fair week at school (I have 3 children) and this morning was Donuts for Dads.  In 20 minutes we sold over $5,000 worth of books.  And, I might add, the Hannah Montana and High School Musical books were in the minority.  Authors such as Gary Paulson, Madeleine L&#8217;Engle, Lois Lowry, Phyllis Naylor, &#038; Wilson Rawls were flying off the shelves along with a whole host of Newberry winners.  It was wonderful see!  A whole generation of readers coming up in the ranks, dissing the junky books in favor of good writing!!!!</p>
<p>On that note&#8230;I look forward to finishing I Killed Hemingway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohanalakshmi Rajakumar</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/is-fiction-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohanalakshmi Rajakumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=114#comment-162</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;One more thought: are people aware of Shelfari? It&#039;s an online book community. If you look at people&#039;s bookshelves (around the world) you&#039;ll see that fiction - reading in general - is in no dire straits....&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Check out mine, for a sample, if you like: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shelfari.com/mohanalakshmi/shelf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.shelfari.com/mohanalakshmi/shelf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thought: are people aware of Shelfari? It&#8217;s an online book community. If you look at people&#8217;s bookshelves (around the world) you&#8217;ll see that fiction &#8211; reading in general &#8211; is in no dire straits&#8230;.</p>
<p>Check out mine, for a sample, if you like: <a href="http://www.shelfari.com/mohanalakshmi/shelf" rel="nofollow">http://www.shelfari.com/mohanalakshmi/shelf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Darling</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/is-fiction-dying/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Darling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=114#comment-163</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;IS FICTION DEAD? It sure is to me, when the logic is off. FICTION IS DEAD WHEN IT&#039;S DEAD AND LIVE WHEN IT&#039;S LIVE. You can quote me on that. It&#039;s live when the author is dead, because it was live when he (or she) was. And when it&#039;s dead and the author&#039;s alive, the auther is dead, as an author. He may be a bore in the flesh, but okay in a rowboat. Fiction is live when you want to read on, even though you&#039;ve already read it ten times. Fiction is dead where your mind starts to wander–––at all. The great thing about it, is if it is alive, it will stay so, but I think this is all true for any three words.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IS FICTION DEAD? It sure is to me, when the logic is off. FICTION IS DEAD WHEN IT&#8217;S DEAD AND LIVE WHEN IT&#8217;S LIVE. You can quote me on that. It&#8217;s live when the author is dead, because it was live when he (or she) was. And when it&#8217;s dead and the author&#8217;s alive, the auther is dead, as an author. He may be a bore in the flesh, but okay in a rowboat. Fiction is live when you want to read on, even though you&#8217;ve already read it ten times. Fiction is dead where your mind starts to wander–––at all. The great thing about it, is if it is alive, it will stay so, but I think this is all true for any three words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

