<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Do You Do it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writeabetternovel.net/how-do-you-do-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/how-do-you-do-it/</link>
	<description>Practical wisdom for novelists and other storytellers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 03:32:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Edel</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/how-do-you-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Edel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=94#comment-105</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My preference very much depends on what kind of work I&#039;m writing.  When I do short stories, I usually have a jumping-off place and then I just roll, cranking out words for two or three or maybe four hours until it&#039;s done.  For book-length works, my style&#039;s changing like yours, Anne.  I&#039;ve been writing fast for a couple years now, but what I used to do is write a chapter or two or whatever I could finish that day, then either the next day or the next week (whenever I got back to it) I would reread the most recent chapter to get back in the mindset (while making minor corrections) and then move on to the next chapter.  Sometimes I would decide I didn&#039;t like the story&#039;s direction, so I would delete a chapter or two or three and then pick up from wherever I felt the action was still fresh and interesting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Right now, the NaNoWriMo style has me pumping out a rough draft that&#039;s incredibly strange - I can&#039;t live with the message that&#039;s coming out, but I can resist the thoughts that are appearing.  I like this method better, pumping out as many words as possible as fast as possible without looking back.  The characters have far more control now than they&#039;ve ever had before in my works and the story is far more linear (in it&#039;s own way) than previous novel manuscripts I&#039;ve tried.  The only downside I&#039;ve had is that I&#039;ve twice written an ending but had to keep going for the sake of word count.  I didn&#039;t delete either ending - I&#039;ve just rolled with the surprises, and the story has created even more fun as a result.  I don&#039;t know yet how much editing I will need to do (the few sections I&#039;ve read aloud, it felt like there were a lot of paragraphs I could cut), but I think the story framework is much stronger than it would have been had I tried to edit as I go.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My preference very much depends on what kind of work I&#8217;m writing.  When I do short stories, I usually have a jumping-off place and then I just roll, cranking out words for two or three or maybe four hours until it&#8217;s done.  For book-length works, my style&#8217;s changing like yours, Anne.  I&#8217;ve been writing fast for a couple years now, but what I used to do is write a chapter or two or whatever I could finish that day, then either the next day or the next week (whenever I got back to it) I would reread the most recent chapter to get back in the mindset (while making minor corrections) and then move on to the next chapter.  Sometimes I would decide I didn&#8217;t like the story&#8217;s direction, so I would delete a chapter or two or three and then pick up from wherever I felt the action was still fresh and interesting.</p>
<p>Right now, the NaNoWriMo style has me pumping out a rough draft that&#8217;s incredibly strange &#8211; I can&#8217;t live with the message that&#8217;s coming out, but I can resist the thoughts that are appearing.  I like this method better, pumping out as many words as possible as fast as possible without looking back.  The characters have far more control now than they&#8217;ve ever had before in my works and the story is far more linear (in it&#8217;s own way) than previous novel manuscripts I&#8217;ve tried.  The only downside I&#8217;ve had is that I&#8217;ve twice written an ending but had to keep going for the sake of word count.  I didn&#8217;t delete either ending &#8211; I&#8217;ve just rolled with the surprises, and the story has created even more fun as a result.  I don&#8217;t know yet how much editing I will need to do (the few sections I&#8217;ve read aloud, it felt like there were a lot of paragraphs I could cut), but I think the story framework is much stronger than it would have been had I tried to edit as I go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Willkomm</title>
		<link>http://writeabetternovel.net/how-do-you-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Willkomm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truevoice-blog.com/?p=94#comment-106</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I used to write a chapter at a time and then go back and revise and revise and revise, then I would move on to the next chapter.  I think it was Bill who said that was a form of procrastination.  If I&#039;m honest, he&#039;s right.  It takes an incredibly long time to finish when you spend a month or so on 15 or so pages.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, prior to Bill making that comment, I had a deadline for a competition.  I decided to finish a project I had been working on in the fashion as I described above and I sat down and finished...never looking back at a single word.  It was hard!  But, it taught me that if you want to finish a project, you actually have to go at it with the mentality of finishing it.  Then, I went back and edited and continue to edit.  I find the more organized approach of note cards, etc. more helpful on the editing side.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I even took a break from the editing and wrote a 220 page young adult novel for my son, and never stopped to look back and finished it in a matter of about 6 weeks.  Again, I have a great deal of editing to do, but I was truly amazed at how the story eveolved and emerged.  That being said, this particular story is about my son and his late grandfather -- so I had very little character development (which I think makes it easier to get the novel out).  In the editing phase I will have character issues to address.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to write a chapter at a time and then go back and revise and revise and revise, then I would move on to the next chapter.  I think it was Bill who said that was a form of procrastination.  If I&#8217;m honest, he&#8217;s right.  It takes an incredibly long time to finish when you spend a month or so on 15 or so pages.</p>
<p>But, prior to Bill making that comment, I had a deadline for a competition.  I decided to finish a project I had been working on in the fashion as I described above and I sat down and finished&#8230;never looking back at a single word.  It was hard!  But, it taught me that if you want to finish a project, you actually have to go at it with the mentality of finishing it.  Then, I went back and edited and continue to edit.  I find the more organized approach of note cards, etc. more helpful on the editing side.</p>
<p>I even took a break from the editing and wrote a 220 page young adult novel for my son, and never stopped to look back and finished it in a matter of about 6 weeks.  Again, I have a great deal of editing to do, but I was truly amazed at how the story eveolved and emerged.  That being said, this particular story is about my son and his late grandfather &#8212; so I had very little character development (which I think makes it easier to get the novel out).  In the editing phase I will have character issues to address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

